Systematic review / meta-analysis 2021
Original English research record

Procedural Learning in Individuals with Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Dementia: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Neuropsychology review

Original abstract

Abstract

The notion that procedural learning and memory is spared in Alzheimer's disease (AD) has important implications for interventions aiming to build on intact cognitive functions. However, despite these clinical implications, there are mixed findings in the literature about whether or not procedural learning remains intact. This meta-analysis examines the standard mean difference of all published studies regarding procedural learning in AD dementia or amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (aMCI) compared to cognitively healthy older adults. Additionally, we conducted statistical equivalence analyses. Our systematic review showed that only a limited number of studies (k = 17) have compared procedural learning between individuals with aMCI or AD dementia and healthy controls. Our meta-analysis, which synthesized these studies, demonstrated that while procedural learning performance was not statistically equivalent between individuals with aMCI or AD dementia, and healthy older adults, the difference was clinically and statistically trivial. Although larger studies are needed, the present findings suggest that procedural learning does appear to remain spared in aMCI and AD dementia.

Authors and publication

De Wit L, Marsiske M, O'Shea D, Kessels RPC, Kurasz AM, DeFeis B, Schaefer N, Smith GE.

Journal
Neuropsychology review
Publication year
2021
DOI
10.1007/s11065-020-09449-1
Open the full source
This abstract is for information and research. It is not medical advice, a diagnosis or a treatment recommendation.