Systematic review / meta-analysis 2019
Original English research record

Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of preeclampsia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

BMC pregnancy and childbirth

Original abstract

Abstract

Background The objective of this systematic review and meta-analyses was to assess the risk of preeclampsia among women who conceived with assisted reproductive technology (ART).

Methods We searched the ISI Web of Knowledge, Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and Embase (from inception to May 2017) for English language articles using a list of key words. In addition, reference lists from identified studies and relevant review articles were also searched. Data extraction was performed by two authors, and the study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Random-effects model meta-analysis was applied to pool the relative risks (RR) across studies.

Results A total of 48 studies (5 case-control studies and 43 cohort studies) were included in this meta-analysis. The Cochran Q test and I 2 statistics revealed substantial heterogeneity (Q = 26,313.92, d.f. = 47, p 2 = 99.8%). Meta-analysis showed a significant increase in preeclampsia in women who conceived by ART compared with those who conceived spontaneously (RR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.11-2.62, p = 0.015).

Conclusions The findings of this systematic review indicate that the use of ART treatment is associated with a 1.71-fold increase in preeclampsia.

Authors and publication

Almasi-Hashiani A, Omani-Samani R, Mohammadi M, Amini P, Navid B, Alizadeh A, Khedmati Morasae E, Maroufizadeh S.

Journal
BMC pregnancy and childbirth
Publication year
2019
DOI
10.1186/s12884-019-2291-x
Open the full source
This abstract is for information and research. It is not medical advice, a diagnosis or a treatment recommendation.