Preciznost 3D skenera kompatibilnih sa mobilnim uređajima za digitalizaciju lica: sistematski pregled i meta-analiza.
Journal of medical Internet research
Sažetak istraživanja
Pozadina Tačna procjena i stjecanje anatomskih informacija lica značajno doprinosi povećanju pouzdanosti tretmana u stomatološkim i medicinskim oblastima, a ima primjenu u poljima kao što su kraniomaksilofacijalna hirurgija, ortodoncija, protetika, ortopedija i sudska medicina. Izvještava se da su 3D skeneri lica kompatibilni s mobilnim uređajima učinkovit alat za kliničku upotrebu, ali tačnost digitalnih otisaka lica dobijenih pomoću skenera nije istražena.
Cilj Cilj nam je bio da revidiramo poređenja tačnosti skenera lica kompatibilnih sa mobilnim uređajima za digitalizaciju lica sa sistemima za profesionalno 3D skeniranje lica.
Methods Individual search strategies were employed in PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, Science Direct, and Cochrane Library databases to search for articles published up to May 27, 2020. Peer-reviewed journal articles evaluating the accuracy of 3D facial models generated by mobile device-compatible face scanners were included. Procjene veličine Cohen d efekta i intervali povjerenja skupova podataka standardizirane srednje razlike (SMD) korišteni su za metaanalizu.
Results By automatic database searching, 3942 articles were identified, of which 11 articles were considered eligible for narrative review, with 6 studies included in the meta-analysis. Sve u svemu, tačnost modela lica dobijenih korišćenjem skenera lica kompatibilnih sa mobilnim uređajima bila je značajno niža od one kod modela lica dobijenih korišćenjem profesionalnih 3D skenera lica (SMD 3,96 mm, 95% CI 2,81-5,10 mm; z=6,78; P zaključci Sve u svemu, sistemi za skeniranje lica kompatibilnim sa mobilnim uređajima3 nisu radili dobro kao profesionalni sistemi za skeniranje lica 3 akvizicija lica, ali su odstupanja bila unutar klinički prihvatljivog raspona od <1,5 mm. Uočene su značajne razlike između rezultata kada su 3D skeniranja lica obavljena na neživim objektima i kada su izvršena na licima živih sudionika, stoga je potreban oprez pri tumačenju rezultata istraživanja na neživim objektima.
Prikaži originalni naslov i sažetak na engleskom
Accuracy of Mobile Device-Compatible 3D Scanners for Facial Digitization: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Background The accurate assessment and acquisition of facial anatomical information significantly contributes to enhancing the reliability of treatments in dental and medical fields, and has applications in fields such as craniomaxillofacial surgery, orthodontics, prosthodontics, orthopedics, and forensic medicine. Mobile device-compatible 3D facial scanners have been reported to be an effective tool for clinical use, but the accuracy of digital facial impressions obtained with the scanners has not been explored.
Objective We aimed to review comparisons of the accuracy of mobile device-compatible face scanners for facial digitization with that of systems for professional 3D facial scanning.
Methods Individual search strategies were employed in PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, Science Direct, and Cochrane Library databases to search for articles published up to May 27, 2020. Peer-reviewed journal articles evaluating the accuracy of 3D facial models generated by mobile device-compatible face scanners were included. Cohen d effect size estimates and confidence intervals of standardized mean difference (SMD) data sets were used for meta-analysis.
Results By automatic database searching, 3942 articles were identified, of which 11 articles were considered eligible for narrative review, with 6 studies included in the meta-analysis. Overall, the accuracy of face models obtained using mobile device-compatible face scanners was significantly lower than that of face models obtained using professional 3D facial scanners (SMD 3.96 mm, 95% CI 2.81-5.10 mm; z=6.78; P
Conclusions Overall, mobile device-compatible face scanners did not perform as well as professional scanning systems in 3D facial acquisition, but the deviations were within the clinically acceptable range of <1.5 mm. Significant differences between results when 3D facial scans were performed on inanimate facial objects and when performed on the faces of living participants were found; thus, caution should be exercised when interpreting results from studies conducted on inanimate objects.
Izvorni podaci
- DOI
- 10.2196/22228
- PMID
- 33095178
- PMCID
- PMC7647818
- Provjereno
- 2026-07-26
Naslov i sažetak prevedeni su automatski i prijevod može sadržavati netačnosti ili neprecizne stručne izraze. Za sve detalje, citiranje i medicinsko tumačenje pregledajte originalnu englesku verziju članka. Ne donosite zdravstvene odluke samo na osnovu ovog prijevoda.
Pregledaj originalni članak na engleskom